The Curse of Knowledge
Once you understand something, it becomes very hard to imagine not understanding it — which is why leaders consistently overestimate how clearly their priorities have landed.
Nudges
Two-minute reads on the behavioural research behind culture, each ending with one thing you can try with your team this week.
In partnership with Nudges at Work by Tareef Jafferi and the team at Happily.ai.
Once you understand something, it becomes very hard to imagine not understanding it — which is why leaders consistently overestimate how clearly their priorities have landed.
Feedback makes performance worse surprisingly often. Whether it was positive or negative barely matters — what matters is whether it points attention at the work or at the person.
Unfinished tasks keep tugging at your attention — but you don’t have to finish them to make the tug stop. Writing a specific plan does almost as much.
People speed up as a finish line gets closer and slow down when a new goal starts. Long programmes with one distant finish line stall in the middle.
When a measure becomes a target, people optimise the number instead of the thing it was meant to indicate — sometimes disastrously.
People tend to like you more after they’ve done you a favour — but only when you asked them yourself.
Groups usually make people coast — except when the team’s result depends visibly on the weakest contributor. Then that person works harder than they would alone.
Holidays genuinely restore wellbeing — but the benefits largely vanish within two to three weeks of returning to work.
Five minutes with a real beneficiary can transform motivation for weeks. Reading about the same person does almost nothing.
Publicly recognising a few specific top performers lifted output across the whole group — with much of the gain coming from people who weren’t recognised.
The person who launched a failing project is the person least able to stop it — not from stubbornness, but because stopping means admitting the original call was wrong.
One sentence attached to critical feedback dramatically increased how many people acted on it — especially those who trusted the giver least.
People are far more likely to finish something when they feel they’ve already started — even if the remaining work is identical.
A visible mistake makes a highly competent person more likeable — but makes someone of unproven ability less likeable.
Habits take much longer to form than the “21 days” myth suggests — and missing one day barely matters. What kills a habit is the dramatic restart afterwards.
Burnout comes from job demands outrunning resources. Teaching individuals to cope better doesn’t fix a structural imbalance.
Trust is built through small, frequent acts of help far more than through rare grand gestures.
People who mentally switch off from work in the evening come back with more energy and less exhaustion — even with the same workload.
Organisations slow themselves down by treating easily reversible choices with the same heavy process as irreversible ones.
Annual surveys measure memory, not experience. Two questions asked weekly reveal far more than sixty asked once a year.
Managers account for at least 70% of the variance in team engagement — more than pay, perks or mission.
Anonymous feedback protects people in low-trust environments — but it can’t be followed up, so it rarely gets acted on. How much anonymity you need is a measure of trust.
One-to-ones run on the manager’s agenda feel productive but rarely surface real problems. When the report owns the agenda, different issues come up.
People reliably pick urgent tasks over important ones — even when the important task pays off more.